Drafts an analytic rubric from the teacher objective and task prompt, then checks each criterion against the objective and lists gaps.
Under review
Our approachDiscover tools, examine the evidence, and put responsible practices to work.
Get the AgenticED Brief in your inbox. Subscribe free
Find tools for your goals.
Explore evidence and guidance.
Consider fit, risks, and classroom context.
Put responsible practices to work with your agent.
Drafts an analytic rubric from the teacher objective and task prompt, then checks each criterion against the objective and lists gaps.
Under review
Configures a retrieval agent over published IT knowledge base articles that answers staff questions with article links and escalates to a ticket when unsure.
Under review
Takes an investigator's draft DMS Plan text (no participant data) and drafts a gap list against NIH's Writing a Data Management and Sharing Plan page: the 2026 DMS Plan format is now required for all competing and non-competing awards; it asks yes or no questions on maximum appropriate sharing, timing (by publication or by the end of the period of performance), and availability for as long as repository or journal policies require; any "no" needs a stated ethical, legal or technical reason in 300 words or fewer; it asks about participant privacy protections and access controls, a table of key data types and repositories (100 words maximum), and Genomic Data Sharing questions where they apply. The gap list also flags reasons NIH says are generally not justifiable (data too small, not widely used, no suitable repository) and reminds staff that a summary and costs go in the budget justification.
Under review
Reads the school's or district's existing food allergy management plan (the general plan, not any individual child's plan) and drafts a gap checklist against the five priority areas CDC says each Food Allergy Management Prevention Plan should address: daily management, emergency preparedness, staff professional development, education for children and families, and a safe environment.
Under review
Runs automated checks on public pages, lists WCAG failures with page links, and drafts fix tickets.
Under review
Takes a teacher lesson plan and proposes alternative means of representation, engagement and expression mapped to UDL guideline checkpoints.
Under review
Takes a teacher's list of openly licensed images, texts and music used in a slide deck or handout and drafts an attribution line for each one using the Creative Commons TASL elements (Title, Author, Source, License), flags items whose license details are missing, and flags any planned change to an ND (NoDerivatives) licensed work, since CC says those licenses do not allow adaptations.
Under review
Reads USAC public E-Rate program pages and drafts an internal calendar of filing windows and steps with links.
Under review
Reads EPA's public Clean School Bus (CSB) program page on a set schedule and drafts a one-page status brief for a district transportation director: what the page currently says about open or upcoming funding, the dates it names, and what changed since the last brief, with links to the rebate documents and awards pages it lists.
Under review
Takes the district's onboarding calendar and process notes (who completes Section 2, whether the district uses E-Verify; no employee names or documents) and drafts an HR checklist from USCIS I-9 Central: Form I-9 is required for every person hired for pay; its parts are Section 1 (employee), Section 2 (employer or authorized representative), Supplement A (preparer or translator) and Supplement B (reverification and rehires); Section 2 must be completed within 3 business days of the first day of work for pay (for example, a Monday start means Thursday), or by the first day if the job lasts under 3 days; employees choose one List A document or one List B plus one List C document, and staff must not ask for a specific list; under E-Verify a List B document must have a photo and remote examination is only for E-Verify participants. Output is a timeline per start-date pattern and a checklist of employer duties (examine originals, record document details, enter the physical address and not a P.O. box, return documents).
Under review
Maps the district's public-facing practices against CISA K-12 recommendations and drafts a gap checklist.
Under review
Takes a list of course names and the local retention rule (no student data) and drafts a per-course reset checklist from MoodleDocs "Reset course": confirm a backup including user data exists first (MoodleDocs says reset is irreversible), choose General, Role, Gradebook, Group and Activity options, set a new course start date (all dates shift by the same amount), and note that course logs are not deleted and grades remain recorded against user accounts. Adds the Moodle 5.2 asynchronous reset setting and where admins monitor it.
Under review
Takes the business office's list of federal awards (program names, Assistance Listing numbers, pass-through entities and award IDs; no personal data) and drafts a SEFA readiness checklist from 2 CFR 200.510(b): programs listed by federal agency with Assistance Listing numbers, cluster names and totals, pass-through entity names and identifying numbers, totals to subrecipients, loan balances in notes, and a note on significant accounting policies and whether the de minimis indirect rate (up to 15 percent) was used. Adds the 200.501 threshold check ($1,000,000 or more in federal expenditures triggers a single or program-specific audit).
Under review
Takes the district's local SIS code tables (code values and labels only, for example attendance or exit codes; no student records) and drafts a gap list against Ed-Fi default descriptors: which local codes map cleanly to ed-fi.org namespace values, which have no match, and which are in locally defined namespaces. Names the Data Standard version used (Ed-Fi lists v6.1.0 as current, and notes v6.0 brought breaking API changes).
Under review
Compares the school draft against published state AI guidance and produces a gap table with citations.
Under review
Turns a leader list of topics into a timed agenda and a notes template with action-item fields.
Under review
Drafts an agenda and planning checklist for a local Head Start and elementary school transition summit, organized around the four points of connection HeadStart.gov names (family-school, child-school, program-school, community-school) and linking the HeadStart.gov summit guide, slides and planning tools.
Under review
Collects approved announcements and drafts a newsletter with consistent formatting and plain language.
Under review
Reads a district or state CTE team's written work-based learning (WBL) program description and drafts a gap sheet against the three components the U.S. Department of Education WBL Toolkit names for comprehensive programs (alignment of classroom and workplace learning; application of academic, technical and employability skills in a work setting; support from classroom or workplace mentors), plus the toolkit's sections on engaging employers, collecting data and scaling programs, with questions for the team.
Under review
Proposes alt text for public non-student images and flags images that need human description.
Under review
Drafts a building walkthrough plan and task list for a school indoor air quality (IAQ) team, drawn from EPA's IAQ Tools for Schools resources (the Framework for Effective School IAQ Management, the Action Kit and the Preventive Maintenance Guidance), covering the areas EPA's walkthrough checklists address: ventilation, cleaning and maintenance, environmental asthma triggers, radon and integrated pest management.
Under review
Drafts posts from approved district announcements and places them in a scheduling queue as drafts.
Under review
Reads an instructor syllabus and drafts an FAQ page with section citations, flagging gaps.
Under review
Drafts plain-language explainers from public parent center resources, with links.
Under review
Reads a unit outline the teacher provides, drafts practice questions with answer keys tied to source passages, and flags questions it cannot ground in the material.
Under review
Reads a public funding notice and drafts a requirements checklist with section references.
Under review
Searches the What Works Clearinghouse for a named practice, summarizes the review ratings with links, and states when no review exists.
Under review
Takes a program's planned staff training calendar (session titles, dates and target roles only; no staff names, records or child information) and drafts a coverage matrix against 45 CFR 1302.47(b)(4). Staff with regular child contact need initial orientation within three months of hire and ongoing training that covers, as appropriate to role and child ages: infectious disease prevention; SIDS prevention and safe sleep; medication administration with parental consent; food and allergic reaction emergencies; building and premises safety, including water and vehicle hazards; prevention of shaken baby syndrome, abusive head trauma and maltreatment; emergency preparedness; hazardous materials and biocontaminants; transportation precautions if applicable; first aid and CPR; and recognizing and reporting child abuse and neglect. Staff without regular child contact need orientation within three months, training on the health and safety rules for their work, and emergency and disaster procedures. Each topic is marked covered, not found, or needs review, with the calendar session cited.
Under review
Drafts a crosswalk of existing written IT procedures to NIST CSF functions and lists unmapped areas.
Under review
Curates and summarizes public resources on UDL and inclusive practice into a staff resource list with links.
Under review
Gathers the vendor public privacy and product pages and drafts answers to a review checklist, marking each answer sourced or unknown.
Under review
Takes a college's published Satisfactory Academic Progress (SAP) policy text (public, no student data) and drafts a gap list for the financial aid office against the 2025-2026 FSA Handbook, Volume 1, Chapter 1: whether the policy states both qualitative and quantitative standards, whether it is at least as strict as the policy for students not receiving Title IV aid in the same program, how and when progress is checked, whether rounding rules are stated if used, and whether financial aid warning, appeal, probation and academic plan terms match how the handbook describes them (for example, warning is only for schools that check SAP every payment period and lasts one payment period). Each gap cites the handbook section it comes from.
Under review
Reads a school's or district's existing family engagement plan and drafts a reflection sheet mapping it to the sections of the Dual Capacity-Building Framework for Family-School Partnerships (Version 2): the challenge, essential conditions, policy and program goals, and capacity outcomes, with questions for the planning team on gaps.
Under review
Searches Grants.gov for listings matching district criteria, summarizes eligibility and deadlines with links, and flags uncertain fits.
Under review
Answers prospective student questions from public institutional web pages with links, and routes anything account-specific to staff.
Under review
Reads public board policy documents the district supplies and drafts an FAQ with citations to policy sections.
Under review
Compares public guidance and drafts an options memo with citations.
Under review
Monitors USDA FNS program pages, drafts a plain summary of changes with links for nutrition staff.
Under review
Pulls the leader's state entry from a public tracker, summarizes key expectations with links, and lists open questions.
Under review
Translates a teacher-written family letter into requested languages and produces a back-translation for spot checks.
Under review
Classifies incoming staff tickets by category and urgency, suggests a routing queue and a draft reply.
Under review
Agent determines student eligibility, services or placement from records.
Under review
Set clear goals, provide context, and define guardrails. Copy a reusable skill and adapt it to your work.
{
"name": "source_grounded_educator_preparation",
"version": "1.0",
"instructions": [
"Ground responses in the provided materials.",
"Cite source locations and state uncertainty.",
"Never upload student records.",
"Preserve learner thinking; require educator review.",
"Never change configuration or contact others automatically."
]
} Download instructions