← All use cases

Under review. This entry has not yet passed all eight gates of Methodology 1.0. It is a contextual editorial recommendation.

Under review conditional

Check a district's Perkins V comprehensive local needs assessment draft against the required statutory elements

Takes a district's draft comprehensive local needs assessment (CLNA) narrative and stakeholder meeting list (aggregate, published performance figures only; no student records) and drafts a gap list against 20 U.S.C. 2354(c) and (d): the CLNA must be included in the local application and updated at least once every 2 years; it must include (A) an evaluation of student performance against state and local levels, including special populations and subgroups; (B) a description of whether programs are sufficient in size, scope and quality and aligned to in-demand sectors or occupations identified by the state or local workforce board, or designed to meet other local needs; (C) progress implementing programs and programs of study; (D) plans to improve recruitment, retention and training of CTE teachers, faculty, support staff, paraprofessionals and counselors; and (E) progress on equal access for special populations. The consultation check lists the stakeholder groups the statute requires at a minimum (secondary and postsecondary CTE representatives, workforce boards and employers, parents and students, special population representatives, agencies serving out-of-school, homeless and at-risk youth, Tribes where applicable, and any others the state requires).

Human in the loop: CTE director and the stakeholder group review the gap list; the workflow does not rate programs or decide funding. Limits: States add their own CLNA templates and deadlines, which the director must confirm with the state agency. Performance analysis uses only published aggregate figures; small-cell or student-level data stays out. Not legal advice. Methodology 1.0: Strong candidate for replay.

How to run: Check a district's Perkins V comprehensive local needs assessment draft against the required statutory elements

  1. Takes a district's draft comprehensive local needs assessment (CLNA) narrative and stakeholder meeting list (aggregate, published performance figures only; no student records) and drafts a gap list against 20 U.S.C. 2354(c) and (d): the CLNA must be included in the local application and updated at least once every 2 years; it must include (A) an evaluation of student performance against state and local levels, including special populations and subgroups; (B) a description of whether programs are sufficient in size, scope and quality and aligned to in-demand sectors or occupations identified by the state or local workforce board, or designed to meet other local needs; (C) progress implementing programs and programs of study; (D) plans to improve recruitment, retention and training of CTE teachers, faculty, support staff, paraprofessionals and counselors; and (E) progress on equal access for special populations. The consultation check lists the stakeholder groups the statute requires at a minimum (secondary and postsecondary CTE representatives, workforce boards and employers, parents and students, special population representatives, agencies serving out-of-school, homeless and at-risk youth, Tribes where applicable, and any others the state requires).
  2. CTE director and the stakeholder group review the gap list; the workflow does not rate programs or decide funding.
  3. States add their own CLNA templates and deadlines, which the director must confirm with the state agency. Performance analysis uses only published aggregate figures; small-cell or student-level data stays out. Not legal advice.
Sources: 20 U.S. Code 2354, Local application for career and technical education programs | Cornell LII ↗ (Snapshot pending)Perkins V | U.S. Department of Education, OCTAE ↗ (Snapshot pending)

Suggest a use case